Skill Store 33

Membrane Economics Edi

RO/EDI economics (SEC, LCOW, lifecycle decision matrix), Electrodeionization deep-dive (cell pair…

by claude-dev-suite · MIT

The skill

RO/EDI economics (SEC, LCOW, lifecycle decision matrix), Electrodeionization deep-dive (cell pair geometry, FCE feed metric, KPIs, 8 failure modes), EDI vs Mixed-Bed DI sizing economics, pharmaceutical UPW/WFI regulatory context (USP/Ph. Eur./21 CFR Part 11/EU Annex 11), produced-water regulatory context (WHO/ISO 16075/EN 12952-12/SEMI F63). Use for energy benchmarks, cost modelling, EDI design/diagnostics, and regulatory citation.

Membrane Economics, Energy & EDI Deep Dive

Two-part reference. Part 1 covers SEC/LCOW/lifecycle. Part 2 covers EDI process, KPIs, failure modes, and regulatory context for produced water and pharmaceutical UPW.

Convention markers:

  • ⚠️ — likely bug or incorrect assumption in calling code
  • 💡 — enhancement opportunity (new alert, new field, new module)

PART 1 — Energy & Economics

§1 — Specific Energy Consumption (SEC)

Operator-facing formula:

SEC = (P_HPP − P_ERD_recovered) / Q_permeate          [kWh/m³]

where P_HPP = high-pressure-pump draw (kW), P_ERD_recovered = power recovered by ERD (kW), Q_permeate in m³/h. For brackish/tertiary systems without ERD the second term is zero.

Engineering-grade form:

SEC = ΔP_feed / (3600 · η_pump · R) − (1 − R) · ΔP_brine · η_ERD / (3600 · R)

with R = recovery, ΔP in bar.

1.1 Benchmarks by source water (verified 2025–2026)

Feed type TDS Typical SEC Best-in-class Source
SWRO (open ocean) ~35 000 mg/L 2.5–4.0 kWh/m³ 1.794 kWh/m³ Danfoss DESALRO 2.0 record, Pozo Izquierdo, Gran Canaria, Feb 2025 Danfoss press release / Guinness
Modern large SWRO 35 000 mg/L 2.0–2.8 kWh/m³ Previous record 2.27 kWh/m³ (SWCC, KSA) Danfoss
BWRO industrial 1 000–10 000 mg/L 0.5–1.5 kWh/m³ 0.5–0.8 with ERD + optimal recovery ScienceDirect S004896972402919X
Tertiary reuse RO < 2 000 mg/L 0.5–1.5 kWh/m³ — EPA WaterReuse

1.2 Thermodynamic minimum

  • ≈ 1.06 kWh/m³ for SWRO at R = 0.5, T = 25 °C, 35 g/L TDS
  • Derived from Gibbs free energy of separation with Spiegler-Kedem reversible-process framework
  • Theoretical minimum at infinite dilution: ≈ 0.78 kWh/m³

Sources: Journal of Chemical Education 2021 (doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01194); Wang et al., Desalination 2016 (S001191641630087X "Thermodynamic perspective for SEC of seawater desalination"); US-DOE Seawater Desalination Bandwidth Study 2017.

⚠️ The "Stenzel" attribution sometimes seen on the open web for the 1.06 figure is not confirmed; cite the Spiegler-Kedem / Gibbs derivation instead.

1.3 ERD comparison

ERD type Peak η Field η Notes
Pelton wheel 80–87 % 78–85 % Older centrifugal recovery; hydraulic → mechanical → hydraulic
Calder DWEER (isobaric dual-work) 98 % 93–96 % Licensed by Calder AG
Energy Recovery PX (rotary pressure exchanger) 95–98 % 93–96.4 % Industry standard for large SWRO

ERD payback rule of thumb: < 2 years for plants > 1 000 m³/d at industrial electricity tariffs.


§2 — LCOW (Levelized Cost of Water)

LCOW = (CAPEX_annualized + OPEX_annual) / Q_produced_annual
CRF  = i·(1+i)^n / ((1+i)^n − 1)            # capital recovery factor

2.1 Component breakdown — SWRO

Component Share
CAPEX amortized 40–50 %
Energy 30–40 % (grid-cost dependent)
Chemicals + cleaning 5–10 %
Membrane replacement 5–10 %
Labor + O&M 10–15 %

2.2 LCOW ranges (verified 2024–2026)

Plant class LCOW (USD/m³) Source
Large SWRO (> 50 000 m³/d, excl. intake/outfall) $0.53–$1.58 Advisian
Utility-scale SWRO with high-solar 2026 forecast $0.45–$0.70 Energy-solutions.co
Small-island SWRO $1.50–$3.00 IDA Yearbook / Advisian
BWRO industrial $0.20–$0.50 Foreverpureplace

2.3 Sensitivity ranking

  1. Electricity unit price
  2. Membrane lifespan & replacement rate
  3. Recovery rate (R)
  4. Plant capacity factor (uptime)
  5. Discount rate / WACC for CAPEX amortization

Sources: Advisian Cost of Desalination; ScienceDirect S2213138823000577.


§3 — Operational KPIs (beyond instantaneous calculations)

KPI Healthy Stressed Action
Membrane life SWRO 5–7 yr (8–10 best) 3–5 yr Review pretreatment
Membrane life BWRO 7–10 yr 2–3 yr Antiscalant + CIP review
CIP frequency 1–2/yr 4–6/yr Diagnose foulant
CIP frequency critical > 6/yr — Replace lead vessel / re-engineer
Availability ≥ 95 % 90–95 % Train rotation / redundancy
NPF baseline drift (lifetime) 5–10 %/yr 15 %+/yr Investigate compaction vs fouling
NSP baseline drift (lifetime) 10–20 % > 25 % Approach replacement

Sources: Aqualitek SWRO maintenance guide; FilmTec/DuPont Form 45-D01911 Exceptional Membrane Life; Pumps & Systems Life of an RO Membrane.


§4 — Lifecycle Decision Matrix

Signature → action mapping that turns trends into operational decisions:

Observation Likely cause Reversibility Action Rationale
NPF −15 % in 30 d, ΔPn +20 % Particulate / biofouling Reversible CIP (alkaline + biocide) Standard recovery
NPF −20 % over 3 yr, ΔPn stable Compaction Irreversible Tolerate or schedule replacement No CIP benefit
NSP +50 % sudden Mechanical integrity loss Localised Probe sweep; replace lead element Acute defect
NSP +30 % over 2 yr Cumulative oxidation Irreversible Replace lead vessel set; audit RedOx Wear pattern
ΔPn rapid stage 2 only Stage-2 scaling Treatable Antiscalant review + acid CIP Concentration-polarization location
NPF + NSP both down Severe organic fouling Often reversible Hot CIP, then biocide Combined permeability + selectivity hit

💡 A lifecycle_advisor module consuming this table + cumulative-exposure counters + CIP history → enum recommendation {TOLERATE, SCHEDULE_CIP, IMMEDIATE_CIP, REPLACE_LEAD, REPLACE_VESSEL_SET} is more valuable than a single-snapshot alarm.


PART 2 — EDI Deep Dive

§5 — EDI Process Fundamentals

5.1 Cell geometry

Repeating "cell pair" = one dilute (D) compartment + one concentrate (C) compartment, bounded by alternating cation- and anion-exchange membranes. Electrode compartments at stack ends apply DC field.

Ions in D migrate through membranes into C; dilute stream is product.

5.2 In-situ regeneration

At elevated DC voltage, water splits at the bipolar interface of the resin bed in D:

H₂O → H⁺ + OH⁻
  • H⁺ regenerates the cation resin
  • OH⁻ regenerates the anion resin

No NaOH/HCl is needed → no hazardous regenerant waste. This is the central advantage over Mixed-Bed DI.

5.3 Why EDI lives downstream of RO

  • Feed must be ≤ ~40 µS/cm FCE
  • Weak acids (CO₂, SiO₂) load the stack when ionized internally
  • Hardness > 1 ppm CaCO₃ causes concentrate scaling
  • Free chlorine > 0.02 ppm destroys resin permanently

5.4 Verified feed envelope (Ionpure LX series)

Parameter Limit Notes
Feed conductivity (FCE basis) < 40 µS/cm Stack-dependent 25–43 µS/cm
Total hardness (as CaCO₃) < 1.0 ppm Hard limit; risk = concentrate scaling
TOC < 0.5 ppm Anion-resin fouling above
Fe / Mn < 0.01 ppm each Irreversible colloidal fouling
Total CO₂ < 5 ppm typical Loads via FCE; degas if higher
SiO₂ < 1.0 ppm Ionpure LX; < 0.5 ppm preferred Polymerization risk
Total chlorine < 0.02 ppm (target 0) Destroys resin
Temperature 5–45 °C standard; 60 °C HWS modules HWS = hot-water-sanitizable
pH 4–11 Outside → membrane integrity loss
Inlet pressure ≤ 7 bar (100 psi) Mechanical limit

5.5 Recommended EDIDataPoint fields

Required for computing FCE + full diagnostics:

  • feed_conductivity_uS_cm: float
  • feed_co2_ppm: float
  • feed_sio2_ppm: float
  • feed_temperature_C: float
  • product_conductivity_uS_cm: float (or product_resistivity_MOhm_cm)
  • concentrate_conductivity_uS_cm: float
  • feed_flow_m3h: float
  • product_flow_m3h: float
  • concentrate_flow_m3h: float
  • stack_voltage_V: float
  • stack_current_A: float
  • cell_pair_count: int (stack-config metadata)
  • Optional: feed_hardness_ppm, feed_chlorine_ppm

Sources: SnowPure Electropure OEM Manual v3.5.0; DuPont EDI-310 Module Manual (45-D01915); Suez E-Cell.


§6 — EDI KPIs and Formulas

6.1 Conductivity removal

η_κ = (κ_in − κ_out) / κ_in · 100        [%]

6.2 Product resistivity

ρ = 1 / κ

Theoretical max 18.18 MΩ·cm @ 25 °C (pure-water self-ionization). Industrial-grade EDI: ≥ 16 MΩ·cm; pharma UPW polish: 17–18.2 MΩ·cm.

6.3 Water utilization (recovery)

R = Q_product / Q_feed · 100

Typical 90–95 % for industrial EDI.

6.4 Reject ratio

RR = Q_concentrate / Q_feed

Typically 5–10 %.

6.5 FCE — Feed Conductivity Equivalent

The manufacturer-standard load metric for EDI sizing:

FCE [µS/cm] = κ + 2.79 · CO₂[ppm] + 1.94 · SiO₂[ppm]
  • κ = measured conductivity (µS/cm)
  • CO₂ = total carbonate (CO₂ + HCO₃⁻ + CO₃²⁻) as ppm CO₂
  • SiO₂ = total silica (reactive + colloidal)

The 2.79 / 1.94 coefficients reflect equivalent ionic conductivity contributed when each weak acid ionizes inside the stack (HCO₃⁻/CO₃²⁻ for CO₂; H₃SiO₄⁻/H₂SiO₄²⁻ for silica).

Target: FCE 1–5 µS/cm at EDI inlet for two-pass RO + EDI to UPW. Hard limit: FCE ≤ 40 µS/cm (stack-dependent 25–43).

⚠️ Some methodologies use 2.66 for CO₂ instead of 2.79; 2.79 is the SnowPure / E-Cell convention. Pick one and apply consistently across alerts and reporting.

⚠️ FCE requires total CO₂ (CO₂ + HCO₃⁻ + CO₃²⁻), not free CO₂ at sample pH. If the data pipeline ingests only "free CO₂", FCE is systematically under-reported → silent off-spec risk.

💡 EDI alerts that compare against raw feed_conductivity miss CO₂/SiO₂ load. Always compute FCE.

6.6 Specific power

kWh per m³ product, or kWh per kg salt removed. Industrial EDI: 0.1–0.3 kWh/m³ product typical.

6.7 Stack voltage drift (ΔV)

Baseline-tracked. Rising ΔV at constant current → resin/membrane resistance ↑ → scaling, fouling, or resin damage.

6.8 Faraday current efficiency

η_F = (n_ions_transported · F) / (I · t) · 100        [%]

F = 96 485 C/mol (Faraday constant); I = stack current (A); t in s; n in equivalents.

Reflects fraction of current moving target ions vs parasitic water-splitting. Industrial EDI: 60–90 % depending on load.


§7 — EDI Failure Modes (8 scenarios)

# Failure mode Detection signature Root cause Prevention Recovery
1 Scaling in concentrate compartment ΔP↑, ΔV↑, removal↓ Hardness leak > 1 ppm; CO₂ + Ca → CaCO₃ at high local pH from water-splitting Hardness < 1 ppm; lower recovery Acid clean (citric pH 2); replace if irreversible
2 Organic anion fouling ΔV↑, anion removal↓ (higher product conductivity), TOC carryover TOC > 0.5 ppm; humics adsorb on anion resin RO pretreatment, GAC, low-fouling RO Caustic + brine CIP; sometimes irreversible
3 Chloride breakthrough Product Cl⁻ off-spec while bulk conductivity OK High feed Cl⁻ + weak anion exchange at low voltage Raise current density; reduce feed Cl⁻ via 2-pass RO Increase voltage; verify polarity
4 CO₂ overload Product conductivity↑ but ion-specific analyzers OK RO permeate pH not raised; degasser bypassed/failed Membrane degasser before EDI; raise RO permeate pH 8–9 with NaOH Restore degasser; tune pH
5 Silica gel formation ΔP↑, removal↓, irreversible SiO₂ > 1 ppm + low local pH near anode → polymerized SiO₂ Feed SiO₂ < 0.5 ppm; warmer feed (> 15 °C); lower recovery Generally not recoverable — replace module
6 Fe / Mn colloidal fouling Visible brown deposit; ΔP↑; ΔV↑ Fe / Mn > 0.01 ppm; oxidation in feed ORP control upstream; iron filter; < 0.01 ppm Irreversible; replace
7 Polarization / over-limiting current Random spikes in product conductivity; high ΔV; pH excursions in concentrate Current density > limiting current for ion supply in D; excessive water splitting Tune V below limiting current density; segment stacks Reduce current; relax flow
8 Free-chlorine breakthrough Sudden ΔV↑; anion resin → "oatmeal"; quality collapse; irreversible Cl₂ > 0.02 ppm reaches stack (carbon-filter exhausted; SBS failure) ORP sensor with hard interlock; redundant chlorine scavenger Damage is permanent — replace module

Sources: DuPont EDI-310 Module Manual; SnowPure Electropure OEM v3.5.0; WC&P 2007 Fundamentals of EDI Technology; SnowPure Operating EDI in High-Silica Feedwater; ScienceDirect S0011916419308276.


§8 — EDI vs Mixed-Bed DI — Decision Economics

Criterion EDI Mixed-Bed DI
Chemical regeneration No Yes (NaOH + HCl)
Hazardous regen effluent None Yes (acid + caustic, neutralized)
Operation Continuous Cyclical (regen downtime)
CAPEX Higher Lower
OPEX Lower (energy + small replacement) Higher (chemicals + waste handling)
Footprint Larger Smaller
Onsite chemical storage Minimal Significant (HSE risk)
Best for ≥ 50 m³/d continuous; pharma; semi < 20 m³/d intermittent; labs

Crossover capacity: ~30–50 m³/d depending on feed (Stark Water sizing guide).

EDI breakeven shifts lower (favors EDI) when:

  • Chemical procurement is constrained
  • Hazardous-waste disposal is costly
  • Site requires continuous UPW
  • Regulatory regime prefers chemical-free

§9 — Pharmaceutical UPW / WFI Context

9.1 USP <645> Water Conductivity

Three-stage test:

  • Stage 1 — in-line / at-line, uncompensated. Lookup table keyed to measured T. At 25 °C the limit is 1.3 µS/cm.
  • Stage 2 — sample equilibrated to 25 °C in container with stirring; limit 2.1 µS/cm. CO₂ ingress may cause failure.
  • Stage 3 — sample pH-adjusted to 4.0 with saturated KCl; pH-keyed limit (e.g. pH 5.0 → 4.7 µS/cm).

Sources: USP General Chapter <645>; Mettler-Toledo USP 645: 3 Steps.

⚠️ Stage 1 limits are uncompensated. Most online conductivity meters default to 25 °C-temperature-compensated readings. Mixing the two breaks compliance reporting. The compliance signal must be the raw, uncompensated value.

9.2 USP <643> Total Organic Carbon

  • TOC limit: 500 ppb (0.50 mg C/L) for both PW and WFI
  • System suitability: response to sucrose vs 1,4-benzoquinone CRS must be 85–115 %
  • Instrument LoD: ≤ 50 ppb

Sources: Beckman Changes to USP <643>; Veolia/Sievers; Mettler-Toledo.

9.3 Ph. Eur. monographs

  • Ph. Eur. 0008 (Purified Water): same TOC + conductivity envelope as USP for bulk PW
  • Ph. Eur. 0169 (Water for Injection): effective 1 April 2017 (Supplement 9.1) — allows non-distillation WFI: "Reverse Osmosis, single- or double-pass, coupled with electrodeionisation, ultrafiltration or nanofiltration, is suitable." Aligned EP with USP/JP

9.4 Ph. Eur. chapter 2.2.44 — effective 1 July 2026

The genuine 2026 normative change for pharma water:

  • TOC limit re-expressed 0.50 mg/L (from "0.5 mg/L") for significant-figure alignment
  • New Method B for Sterilized Water for Injection (replaces oxidisable-substances test)
  • Sucrose R and 1,4-benzoquinone R replaced by CRS reference standards (USP harmonization)
  • Term "highly purified water" replaced by "water" with κ ≤ 1.0 µS/cm @ 25 °C, TOC ≤ 0.1 mg/L

Sources: FDCELL Revision of Ph. Eur. Water for Pharmaceutical Use to Take Effect on 1 July 2026; EDQM Ph. Eur. 12.x updates.

9.5 Sanitization compatibility

Method Compatibility
Hot water 80–85 °C OK for HWS modules; weekly typical; verify TFC RO temperature spec
Steam (> 121 °C) Limited; only fully steam-sanitizable PVDF assemblies; avoid for typical EDI/RO
Ozone (0.1–0.5 ppm) Limited; destroys polyamide; OK for stainless distribution loops only
Peracetic acid (0.1–0.3 %) OK for most modern membranes (consult vendor)
Formaldehyde (0.5–1 %) Legacy; phased out for GMP/HSE reasons

9.6 Data integrity (21 CFR Part 11 / EU Annex 11)

  • 21 CFR Part 11 (US FDA): audit trails, signature integrity, validated computerized systems, retention. Applies to instruments logging USP <645>/<643> data
  • EU Annex 11 (EudraLex Vol 4, Computerised Systems): risk-based validation; ALCOA+ principles; functional + data-integrity analog to Part 11

§10 — Regulatory Context (Produced Water)

10.1 WHO GDWQ 4th ed. (2022 + 1st & 2nd Addenda)

Selected drinking-water limits:

  • Nitrate (NO₃⁻): 50 mg/L
  • Fluoride: 1.5 mg/L
  • Arsenic: 10 µg/L
  • Lead: 10 µg/L
  • TDS: no health-based guideline; ~1 000 mg/L taste threshold

10.2 ISO 16075-2:2020 — Treated Wastewater for Irrigation

Class Use BOD avg/max (mg/L) TSS avg/max (mg/L) Faecal coliforms (95 %ile, /100 mL)
A Unrestricted food crops ≤ 5 / ≤ 10 ≤ 5 / ≤ 10 ≤ 10
B Restricted food (drip) ≤ 10 / ≤ 20 ≤ 10 / ≤ 25 ≤ 200 / ≤ 1 000
C Industrial crops, fodder ≤ 20 / ≤ 35 ≤ 30 / ≤ 50 ≤ 1 000 / ≤ 10 000
D No public access ≤ 60 / ≤ 100 ≤ 90 / ≤ 140 Nematodes ≤ 1 egg/L; coliforms n/a

10.3 EN 12952-12 — Boiler-feed and Boiler-water Quality

Tiered limits keyed to drum pressure (general guidance — verify full table in standard before encoding limits):

Drum pressure Feed κ (µS/cm) SiO₂ (mg/L) Hardness
< 20 bar < 100 < 1 < 0.02 mmol/L
20–60 bar < 30 < 0.3 < 0.01 mmol/L
> 100 bar (subcritical) < 0.2 < 0.02 Fe < 0.02 mg/L; Cu < 0.003

⚠️ Do not hard-code EN 12952-12 limits as fixed thresholds. Pattern: drum-pressure-keyed lookup table cited to the standard ID.

10.4 SEMI F63:2021 — Semiconductor UPW

  • Resistivity: ≥ 18.2 MΩ·cm @ 25 °C
  • TOC: < 1 ppb (≤ 32 nm nodes); < 0.5 ppb for 3 nm / 2 nm advanced
  • Silica: < 0.3 ppb (some sources < 0.1 ppb leading-edge)
  • Particles: < 1 particle/mL above threshold (size class node-dependent)
  • Bacteria: < 1 CFU / 100 mL

§11 — Cross-cutting Code Recommendations

Tags: 💡 enhancement, ⚠️ potential bug / data-quality risk.

  • 💡 EDIDataPoint should require: stack_voltage_V, stack_current_A, cell_pair_count, feed_co2_ppm, feed_sio2_ppm, feed_temperature_C. Without these, FCE and Faraday efficiency cannot be computed.
  • 💡 EDIKPIs should expose: fce_uS_cm, faraday_current_efficiency_pct, product_resistivity_MOhm_cm, water_utilization_pct, stack_voltage_drift_pct.
  • 💡 EDI_THRESHOLDS must be application-specific. Implement as EDIThresholdProfile enum: PHARMA_WFI, PHARMA_PW, POWER_BOILER_HP, POWER_BOILER_LP, SEMI_LEADING_NODE, SEMI_LEGACY_NODE, INDUSTRIAL_GENERIC.
  • 💡 edi_calculator.py should use FCE as the load metric, not raw conductivity. The 40 µS/cm limit applies to FCE.
  • 💡 New lifecycle_advisor.py module: input = cumulative chlorine exposure, CIP history, NPF/NSP baseline drift, ΔP trend, hours-on-stream; output = enum {TOLERATE, SCHEDULE_CIP, IMMEDIATE_CIP, REPLACE_LEAD, REPLACE_VESSEL_SET} with justification string.
  • ⚠️ Concentrate flow derived as Q_feed − Q_product without sensor reconciliation hides leaks / cross-contamination. Add a closure check with warning at |Q_in − Q_out| / Q_in > 2 %.
  • ⚠️ FCE depends on total CO₂ (CO₂ + HCO₃⁻ + CO₃²⁻), not free CO₂ at sample pH. Free-CO₂-only feeds under-report FCE silently.
  • ⚠️ USP <645> Stage 1 limits are uncompensated. Compliance reporting must use raw uncompensated conductivity, not 25 °C-compensated readings.

Sources

Energy / SEC — Danfoss DESALRO 2.0 case story (Feb 2025); Danfoss Guinness press release; J. Chem. Ed. 2021 doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01194; Wang et al. Desalination 2016 (S001191641630087X); US-DOE Seawater Desalination Bandwidth Study (2017); Energy Recovery Inc. PX product page; Wikipedia DWEER.

Economics — Advisian Cost of Desalination; Energy-Solutions.co SWRO Cost Trends 2026; Foreverpureplace BWRO costs; ScienceDirect S2213138823000577 LCOW sensitivity; ScienceDirect S004896972402919X BWRO SEC optimization.

EDI — SnowPure Electropure OEM Manual v3.5.0; DuPont EDI-310 Module Manual (45-D01915); Suez E-Cell EDI documentation; SnowPure FCE technical article; Stark Water FCE EDI blog; Ionpure LX-HI datasheet DB-LXHI; WC&P 2007 Fundamentals of EDI Technology; SnowPure Operating EDI in High-Silica Feedwater.

Pharma — USP General Chapters <645> and <643>; Mettler-Toledo USP guides; Beckman / Veolia / Sievers TOC references; PharmOut Ph. Eur. allows non-distillation WFI from April 2017; A3P membrane vs distillation comparison; EMA Q&A on non-distillation WFI; FDCELL Ph. Eur. Water Revision 1 July 2026; EDQM Ph. Eur. 12.x updates.

Produced-water regulatory — WHO GDWQ 4th ed. (2022 + addenda); ISO 16075-1..4 (2020–2021); EN 12952-12; SEMI F63:2021; ASME/EPRI boiler-feed guidance; EPA WaterReuse.

Membrane life — FilmTec/DuPont 45-D01911 Exceptional Membrane Life; Aqualitek SWRO maintenance guide; Pumps & Systems Life of an RO Membrane multipart.

Use this skill

Connect your agent to the Skill Store MCP server and ask for it by ref: claude-dev-suite/membrane-economics-edi-74521671455.

Download SKILL.md · Markdown version

Details

Publisher
claude-dev-suite
Category
Business › Misc
License
MIT
Updated
2026-10-19

References

More from claude-dev-suite