Vibeguard
Lightweight anti-hallucination workflow for task kickoff, review prioritization, and regression r…
by majiayu000 · MIT
The skill
Lightweight anti-hallucination workflow for task kickoff, review prioritization, and regression retrospectives. Use when the user asks for guardrails, task contracts, risk scoring, or review templates.
VibeGuard
Lightweight VibeGuard for everyday use inside Spellbook.
This skill helps with three moments where AI-assisted work usually drifts:
- before implementation starts
- while review findings are being prioritized
- after regressions or avoidable mistakes happen
What This Skill Includes
- A task contract checklist for scoping work before coding
- A scoring matrix for prioritizing findings with evidence
- A weekly review template for regression and guardrail retrospectives
Hard Boundaries
This skill is intentionally lightweight.
It does:
- guide task kickoff
- structure review output
- make risk tradeoffs explicit
It does not:
- install hooks
- run guard scripts automatically
- patch global Claude or Codex configuration
- claim that full VibeGuard enforcement is active
If the user asks for automated interception, repo-level rules, or environment setup, escalate to the full VibeGuard repository and tooling.
When To Use It
Trigger this skill when the user asks for:
- anti-hallucination guardrails
- task startup checks
- review scoring or triage
- regression prevention
- retrospective templates
- "vibeguard" by name
Workflow
1. Start With The Task Contract
Open references/task-contract.yaml and confirm:
- goal
- source of truth
- acceptance criteria
- scope
Do not move into implementation until these are concrete.
2. Score Findings Before Acting
Open references/scoring-matrix.md and score each finding on:
- impact
- effort
- risk
- confidence
Use the score to separate urgent fixes from weak guesses.
3. Pick The Right Delivery Mode
- 1-2 files: implement directly once the contract is clear
- 3-5 files: write a short spec or step plan first
- 6+ files: produce a full design/spec and staged execution plan
4. Review The Failure, Not Just The Symptom
If something regressed, identify which defense failed:
- scope control
- source-of-truth validation
- verification depth
- review prioritization
- missing guardrail
Then capture the follow-up in references/review-template.md.
Expected Outputs
Depending on the request, produce one of these:
- a filled task contract
- a scored findings table with priorities
- a short regression review or weekly retrospective
Reference Files
references/task-contract.yaml- kickoff checklistreferences/scoring-matrix.md- prioritization modelreferences/review-template.md- retrospective template
Use this skill
Connect your agent to the Skill Store MCP server and ask for it by ref: majiayu000/vibeguard-20117969422.
Details
- Publisher
- majiayu000
- Category
- Software Development › Source control & code review
- License
- MIT
- Updated
- 2026-10-08
References
More from majiayu000
- Idea Analogist 想法群聊室 — 类比者角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"类比一下"、"别的行业有没有"、"yes-and 扩展"、"X 让你想到什么"、"跨界启示"时触发。**专门做跨界…
- Idea Devils Advocate 想法群聊室 — 反方角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"反方意见"、"挑这个想法的刺"、"为什么会失败"、"找漏洞 / 反例"、"devil's advocate"时触发。…
- Idea Research 想法群聊室 — 调研员角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"调研一下 X"、"X 的现状/竞品/数据"、"找 2026 数据"、"事实底"时触发。**用 WebSearch…
- Idea Team 想法群聊室主持人 — 把一句话想法丢给多角色 AI 团队(调研员/反方/类比者)做查漏补缺。每个角色有自己的 voice,他们互相 @ 接话;你随时插话。**这是创意扩展工具,不打分、不否决、不…