Write Design Docs
Write, revise, or review software design documents using Malte Ubl's "Design Docs at Google" guid…
by pproenca · MIT
The skill
Write, revise, or review software design documents using Malte Ubl's "Design Docs at Google" guidance. Use when Codex needs to draft a design doc, technical design, RFC, engineering review doc, architecture proposal, mini design doc, or design-doc review focused on context, goals, non-goals, trade-offs, alternatives, cross-cutting concerns, review lifecycle, and deciding whether a design doc is warranted.
Write Design Docs
Core Workflow
Use the design doc as a problem-solving and consensus-building tool, not as an implementation manual.
-
Decide whether a design doc is warranted.
- Write one when the software design is ambiguous, complex, contentious, cross-functional, likely to benefit from senior review, or valuable as organizational memory.
- Prefer a short note, issue, or direct implementation when the solution is obvious and there are no meaningful trade-offs.
- Prefer a mini design doc for small but non-obvious changes.
-
Gather the minimum context needed to make the design concrete.
- Identify the problem, existing landscape, constraints, stakeholders, and decision deadline.
- Ask focused questions only when missing information would materially change goals, non-goals, or trade-offs.
- State assumptions explicitly when proceeding with incomplete information.
-
Draft around decisions and trade-offs.
- Start with objective context and scope.
- Define goals and non-goals as explicit boundaries.
- Present the selected design from overview to detail.
- Explain why the selected design best satisfies the goals under the known constraints.
- Compare realistic alternatives, including why they were not selected.
- Cover cross-cutting concerns such as security, privacy, reliability, observability, migrations, and operations when relevant.
-
Keep the document readable.
- Optimize for busy reviewers who need to understand the decision, not every implementation detail.
- Link to detailed requirements, prototypes, schemas, code, or prior docs instead of copying them wholesale.
- Include diagrams or compact API/data sketches only when they clarify the design trade-offs.
- Avoid large code blocks unless explaining a novel algorithm.
-
Shape the lifecycle.
- Mark the document status: draft, in review, accepted, implementing, superseded, or archived.
- Suggest the smallest useful review group first, then wider review when the design is stable.
- Update the doc while the system has not shipped if implementation reveals wrong assumptions or changed requirements.
- Link amendments or follow-up docs when the original doc diverges from reality.
Reference
Read references/design-doc-guidance.md before drafting or reviewing a substantive design doc. Use it for the article-derived template, decision checklist, section guidance, and review rubric.
Use this skill
Connect your agent to the Skill Store MCP server and ask for it by ref: pproenca/write-design-docs-29022732557.
Details
- Publisher
- pproenca
- Category
- Software Development › Misc
- License
- MIT
- Updated
- 2026-08-15
References
More from pproenca
- Bug Review Use this skill when a user asks to review a pull request for bugs, wants AI code review focused o…
- Radical Simplification Cognitive moves for collapsing complexity — reframe, clarify, reduce, decompose, invert, constrai…
- Code Simplifier Code simplification skill for improving clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preservin…
- Debug Comprehensive debugging methodology for finding and fixing bugs (formerly debugging).